Shove them "human rights" thoughts aside for a minute.

[Shoe of all Cosmos]

We, as a human race, are evolving backwards. It's no longer about survival of the fittest, in which a species gets stronger by each generation. Thanks to activists, humans are instead getting weaker. We should not be having to deal with astigmatism and fucking allergies to perfectly normal food. So, I ask you this:

Is it better to improve the quality of life for individual beings by allowing ANYONE to breed and contribute absolute shit to the gene pool in the name of human rights, or...

Is it better to improve the quality of life for all of humanity by requiring a test and a parenting license, foregoing the "human right to breed" and sterilizing criminals, sex offenders, and the retarded?

[Stack of butts]

sounds good in theory but the emotional state of any human would lead to that life style to crumble.

also one must keep in mind unlike the rest of the animal kingdom who can continue to selectively breed due to it's program in their brains humans are the type what place rational thinking aside to personal needs and wants of one self than one race.

now unless you could pull a good Hitler and separate the bad from the good and fooling every one that it's okay to do this with little to no resistance, other than that don't most strengths come with a down side like immune to aids but can die from diarrhea and that if we try to make every one pick out the strong over what one see as weak we would end up leaving holes in our immune system?

[JESUS]

No. It's not their fault if they have problems. Why should they have to sacrifice their happiness for you? If YOU were the one that wasn't allowed to have kids your opinion would be a lot different.

[Rigs]

Maybe you should see Serenity, it gives a pretty good idea of what happens when you try to make a "world without sin".

Operative: I believe in something greater than myself. A better world. A world without sin.

Malcolm Reynolds: So me and mine gotta lay down and die so you can live in your better world?

[Ry_Trapp0]

A) we have allergies to food and shit because we've fucked with that food so much when it was growing or during processing. we're allergic to the extra bullshit that is sprinkled on top, not the food itself(well, obviously this applies to most cases, not all).

2 - why should i give a fuck about the direction that the 'human evoloutionary path' takes? i'm not gonna be alive when that whole 'third arm out the stomach' thing finally happens. there is only one person i'm living for on this earth, that would be ME. i could get a fuck about anyone else. do whatever the hell makes your life better without impeding on others attempts to do the same thing(I.E., robbing a bank or some shit when there are other ways to fulfill your potential need for money). you don't fuck with me, i won't fuck with you, we will both be happy.


all this "for the greater good" bullshit popping up in our world lately is really pissing me off. there really isn't ANY logical reason for a person to put someone else first unless that person benefits from the other person. why should i be forced to give my money to poor people when they are perfectly capable human beings just like i am? this dude i'm friends with grew up in an orphanage, and they kicked him out to the street when he turned 18. he literally didn't have a damn thing besides the clothes on his back. what did he think first? "maybe i should beg people for money, someone outa help me", hell naw! no, he went and found a lawn mower that didn't run, fixed it, and started mowing peoples lawns. now he has a rather large 2 story house, has a steady job(not great, but he knows how to manage money unlike the rest of the people on earth), he collects racing bikes(the expensive ass carbon fiber road racing ones), has tons of RC cars, has 2 $1k+ drum sets(not including the thousands in extras), a full PA system, a guitar and 2 amps, a paid off harley and paid off jeep, and who knows what the hell else.
i know this isn't what the OP was talking about, but both the OP and this fit into the "greater good" mentality, which is absoloute bullshit.

[/rantage]

[Karpolo]

To be honest, I don't think were going to last over 100 years from now due to how we've completely fucked the Earth.
So it doesn't really matter now.

[Ry_Trapp0]

LOL, you enjoy rhetoric, don't you? read up on some legitimate scientific studies(legitimate, as in the ones that arne't funded by congress money since they always give it to the scientist who will support their viewpoint). for example, check out this awesome piece of info...
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/25/online-global-warming-study-censored-by-epa/

*gasp* the government lying??? no!!!
seriously dude, there are 2 opposing sides to every issue, each have their facts and each have their bullshit. don't just look at one side and take their bullshit as fact.

[McKillah]

To be honest, I don't think were going to last over 100 years from now due to how we've completely fucked the Earth.
So it doesn't really matter now.

Yeah. Climate Change, drugs, crime, never-meant-to-be forums....

[Shoe of all Cosmos]

i know this isn't what the OP was talking about, but both the OP and this fit into the "greater good" mentality, which is absoloute bullshit.
[/rantage]

Calm down, it looks like we're kind of on the same side. I disagree with giving free handouts for the "greater good", and I'm very happy about people like your friend making something of their lives despite their beginning hand. I get pissed off the most at people who do nothing to overcome obstacles.

But, about food allergies, I think you're wrong. If what you said is true, then people would be allergic to cheeseburgers and other processed junk food. Instead, all the allergies I've heard of are to natural items, like peanuts, strawberries, coffee, milk, etc.

[Shoe of all Cosmos]

No. It's not their fault if they have problems. Why should they have to sacrifice their happiness for you? If YOU were the one that wasn't allowed to have kids your opinion would be a lot different.

Actually I fucking hate kids, so I'm biased.

[Ry_Trapp0]

But, about food allergies, I think you're wrong. If what you said is true, then people would be allergic to cheeseburgers and other processed junk food. Instead, all the allergies I've heard of are to natural items, like peanuts, strawberries, coffee, milk, etc.
cheeseburgers and cheetos don't have pesticides sprayed on them. peanuts and strawberries do, plus the other chemical fertilizers and the like. never heard of anyone being allergic to coffee. cafiene maybe?
as far as milk is concerned(lactose intolerance), it is largely based on ones geneology. for example, in the ancient times, countrys such as great britain and others in the region drank milk, while italy and surrounding countries didn't drink milk but turned it into cheese, which is mostly lactose free. this means that, because of centuries of repeating this, people whose families originated in italy and surrounding countries are FAR more likely to be lactose intolerant, while people whose families originated in great britain and surrounding countries are FAR less likely to be lactose intolerant.
simply put, if a given item isn't introduced into the system for extended periods of time, your body won't be able to process that item and will go all ape shit. this mostly applies to all food allergies. nothing to do with evoloution.

[Dracophile]

Personally I just think we should take erroneous warning labels off of things (don't put your genitals in a chainsaw) and then just let Darwinism take its course. Find some legal mandate called the "Total Fucking Dumbshit Act of 2010" that makes this action legal. I think we should just let idiots who think they can do things on their own try and trim their trees with hedgetirmmers by parking their truck under a tree and stacking three ladders on top of each other like a triangle. When they fall and inevitably drive their trimmers through their abdomen that's their own problem, probably should have thought that plan through a teensy bit better.

[Shoe of all Cosmos]

Personally I just think we should take erroneous warning labels off of things (don't put your genitals in a chainsaw) and then just let Darwinism take its course. Find some legal mandate called the "Total Fucking Dumbshit Act of 2010" that makes this action legal. I think we should just let idiots who think they can do things on their own try and trim their trees with hedgetirmmers by parking their truck under a tree and stacking three ladders on top of each other like a triangle. When they fall and inevitably drive their trimmers through their abdomen that's their own problem, probably should have thought that plan through a teensy bit better.

You've probably seen this before, but I've gotta post this:

1. On a blanket from Taiwan - NOT TO BE USED AS PROTECTION FROM A TORNADO.

2. On a helmet mounted mirror used by US cyclists - REMEMBER, OBJECTS IN THE MIRROR ARE ACTUALLY BEHIND YOU.

3. On a Taiwanese shampoo - USE REPEATEDLY FOR SEVERE DAMAGE.

4. On the bottle-top of a (UK) flavored milk drink - AFTER OPENING, KEEP UPRIGHT.

5. On a New Zealand insect spray - THIS PRODUCT NOT TESTED ON ANIMALS.

6. In a US guide to setting up a new computer - TO AVOID CONDENSATION FORMING, ALLOW THE BOXES TO WARM UP TO ROOM TEMPERATURE BEFORE OPENING. (Sensible, but the instruction was INSIDE the box.)

7. On an American Airlines packet of nuts INSTRUCTIONS - OPEN PACKET, EAT NUTS.

8. In some countries, on the bottom of Coke bottles - OPEN OTHER END.

9. On a packet of Sunmaid raisins - WHY NOT TRY T O S S I N G OVER YOUR FAVOURITE BREAKFAST CEREAL?
10. On a Sears hairdryer - DO NOT USE WHILE SLEEPING.

11. On a bag of Fritos - YOU COULD BE A WINNER! NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. DETAILS INSIDE.

12. On a bar of Dial soap - DIRECTIONS - USE LIKE REGULAR SOAP.

13. On Tesco's Tiramisu dessert (printed on bottom of the box) - DO NOT TURN UPSIDE DOWN.

14. On Marks & Spencer Bread Pudding - PRODUCT WILL BE HOT AFTER HEATING.

15. On a Korean kitchen knife - WARNING: KEEP OUT OF CHILDREN.

16. On a string of Chinese-made Christmas lights - FOR INDOOR OR OUTDOOR USE ONLY.

17. On a Japanese food processor - NOT TO BE USED FOR THE OTHER USE. (Now I'm curious.)

18. On Sainsbury's peanuts - WARNING - CONTAINS NUTS.

19. On Nightly sleep aid: WARNING: MAY CAUSE DROWSINESS.

20. On a Swedish chainsaw - DO NOT ATTEMPT TO STOP CHAIN WITH YOUR HANDS OR GENITALS.

21. On a child's superman costume - WEARING OF THIS GARMENT DOES NOT ENABLE YOU TO FLY.

22. On some frozen dinners: SERVING SUGGESTION: DEFROST.

23. On a hotel provided shower cap in a box: FITS ONE HEAD.

24. On packaging for a Rowenta iron: DO NOT IRON CLOTHES ON BODY.

25. On Boot's "Children's" cough medicine: DO NOT DRIVE CAR OR OPERATE MACHINERY

[Ry_Trapp0]

Personally I just think we should take erroneous warning labels off of things (don't put your genitals in a chainsaw) and then just let Darwinism take its course. Find some legal mandate called the "Total Fucking Dumbshit Act of 2010" that makes this action legal. I think we should just let idiots who think they can do things on their own try and trim their trees with hedgetirmmers by parking their truck under a tree and stacking three ladders on top of each other like a triangle. When they fall and inevitably drive their trimmers through their abdomen that's their own problem, probably should have thought that plan through a teensy bit better.
to be fair, it's pretty safe to say that the idiots who would kill themselves after this was enacted are already killing themselves because no one reads the warning labels in the first place, lol.

[Walnut]

I think everybody should leave each other the fuck alone. Stay out of their business, stay out of their lives.